<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Case for Outsourcing Marketing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mindpik.com/blog/the-case-for-outsourcing-marketing.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mindpik.com/blog/the-case-for-outsourcing-marketing.html</link>
	<description>Home of Big-M Marketing</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 08:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: George Grenley</title>
		<link>http://www.mindpik.com/blog/the-case-for-outsourcing-marketing.html/comment-page-1#comment-108</link>
		<dc:creator>George Grenley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 08:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindpik.com/blog/?p=104#comment-108</guid>
		<description>You're right, Tom. It's interesting that start-ups who are outsourcing darn near everything else (as they often should) are oddly resistant to the idea of outside marketing resources. Consider it; it does not mean surrendering either control or direction. It just means having the well-staffed marketing department you wish you could afford.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right, Tom. It&#8217;s interesting that start-ups who are outsourcing darn near everything else (as they often should) are oddly resistant to the idea of outside marketing resources. Consider it; it does not mean surrendering either control or direction. It just means having the well-staffed marketing department you wish you could afford.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
